Comments on: Feeds Follow-up – Chinalyst + Feedburner = same problem http://www.cdrum.com/2007/10/20/feeds-follow-up-chinalyst-feedburner-same-problem/ randomness from cdrum Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:51:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Richard Ford http://www.cdrum.com/2007/10/20/feeds-follow-up-chinalyst-feedburner-same-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-4588 Richard Ford Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:37:20 +0000 http://www.cdrum.com/2007/10/20/feeds-follow-up-chinalyst-feedburner-same-problem/#comment-4588 Chinalyst which I just subscribed too seem a little - how does one put it... not that good at tech? For starters, I did a bit of cnic and icann check ups to see where they host, so I csn put in the correct rss url's. What I found out that was funny, was that they only have ONE MX ENTRY setup in their zone files. They also don't have ANY SPF setup and their authoritative DNS servers are only TWO of them, which only allows for a 95% uptime. Can someone say "home brew hosting" here or amateur sys admin..... RF. Chinalyst which I just subscribed too seem a little – how does one put it… not that good at tech?

For starters, I did a bit of cnic and icann check ups to see where they host, so I csn put in the correct rss url’s. What I found out that was funny, was that they only have ONE MX ENTRY setup in their zone files.

They also don’t have ANY SPF setup and their authoritative DNS servers are only TWO of them, which only allows for a 95% uptime.

Can someone say “home brew hosting” here or amateur sys admin…..

RF.

]]>