CCTV said it was deeply grieved “for the severe damage the fire caused to the country’s property.”
CCTV did cover the fire outside its own new headquarters, but it was not the top story.
“According to the Beijing fire department, this fire occurred because the person in charge of the construction of the new building project of CCTV, without permission, hired staff to set off fireworks that violated regulations,” the broadcaster said in a statement on its Web site.
Lucky Mandarin Oriental doesn’t actually own the building, but “[they have] signed a long term contract to manage the hotel and has no ownership interest in the building.”
So, I suppose fireworks in the city isn’t such a good idea, eh? Fireworks used to be banned in the city, but a couple of years ago the city government allowed ordinary citizens to purchase their own fireworks and let them off any where and any time they pleased (yes, with some, but arguably not enough restrictions).
Here are some fireworks I bought 2 years ago:
The Fireworks I bought for CNY 2007 (Actually, half are mine, half are a friend's)
They turned out pretty nice, but as you see, were pretty close to our apartment building:
My fireworks CNY2007, close to my apartment building. Too close!
So, imagine hundreds of thousands, or even a couple of a million(?) people setting off fireworks like these, or bigger. And many not thinking about safety while setting them off. I didn’t buy any this year, mostly to save some money…
Media coverage of the fire last night:
I’m not sure how international media covered the fire last night at the TVCC building within the new CCTV headquarters complex, but local media here in China barely mentioned it (last night). Maybe they didn’t know what to say yet? I think China has yet to understand how to deliver “breaking news”, especially if it involves China. (I am no expert on media, though, so I could be wrong)
Twitter broke the story
As has happened in many other news breaking events in the past, news of this event was broken(?) through Twitter. In fact, my eyes were glued to Tweetgrid #cctvfire, because local television had nothing, nor did the popular Chinese news sites such as Sohu and Sina. International media was slow to pick up on it, yet faster than local media (from what I saw). Here are some international media stories: WSJ, CNN, NY Times, BBC, Reuters.
Finally, today, official state media, Xinhua, has some stories. My favorite one is where they say the fire was caused by fireworksset off by a CCTV-contracted company. Nice work guys. Genius – let’s burn down our own building, shall we? Lucky (?) for them, it was the hotel next door and not the “big pants” HQ.
Can’t argue with this evidence: (Watch the whole thing)
What I want to know is, how can the roof catch on fire so quickly? Could anyone comment?
I am sure someone (or a group) will “pay” for this idiotic mistake. As they should. It caused at least one life (fire fighter) and many injuries. Not to mention some insurance company a lot of dough. What if they caused a fire in an apartment complex?
Incompetence runs rampant (everywhere) and sadly this unfortunate event probably won’t teach many lessons going forward… (how many times have weseenMelamine?
Is it bad taste to say it was an ugly building any way?